<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>droidstone.com &#124; Android, iPhone, Windows, Linux, WebOS &#187; botnet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.droidstone.com/tag/botnet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.droidstone.com</link>
	<description>Smartphone News Portal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US government to beat back botnets with a cybersecurity code of conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of-conduct</link>
		<comments>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of-conduct#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ahmet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code of conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CodeOfConduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber clean center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CyberAttack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CyberCleanCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DepartmentOfHomelandSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributed denial of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DistributedDenialOfService]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InternetServiceProvider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national institute of standards and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NationalInstituteOfStandardsAndTechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PersonalInformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spambot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UsGovernment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoluntaryCode]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
Old Uncle Sam seems determined to crack down on botnets, but he still needs a little help figuring out how to do so. On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published a request for ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/botnet-1316764941.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<p>Old Uncle Sam seems determined to crack down on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Botnet/">botnets</a>, but he still needs a little help figuring out how to do so. On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published a request for information, inviting companies from internet and IT companies to contribute their ideas to a voluntary &#8220;code of conduct&#8221; for ISPs to follow when facing a botnet infestation. The move comes as an apparent response to a June &#8220;Green Paper&#8221; on cybersecurity, in which the Department of Commerce&#8217;s Internet Policy Task Force called for a unified code of best practices to help ISPs navigate through particularly treacherous waters. At this point, the NIST is still open to suggestions from the public, though <em>Ars Technica</em> reports that it&#8217;s giving special consideration to two models adopted overseas. Australia&#8217;s iCode program, for example, calls for providers to reroute requests from shady-looking systems to a site devoted to malware removal. The agency is also taking a hard look at an initiative (diagrammed above) from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/dont-bring-your-computer-viruses-to-japan-because-theyre-ille/">Japan</a>&#8216;s Cyber Clean Center, which has installed so-called &#8220;honeypot&#8221; devices at various ISPs, allowing them to easily detect and source any attacks, while automatically notifying their customers via e-mail. There are, however, some lingering concerns, as the NIST would need to find funding for its forthcoming initiative, whether it comes from the public sector, corporations or some sort of public-private partnership. Plus, some are worried that anti-botnet programs may inadvertently reveal consumers&#8217; personal information, while others are openly wondering whether OS-makers should be involved, as well. The code&#8217;s public comment period will end on November 4th, but you can find more information at the source link, below.
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of/">US government to beat back botnets with a cybersecurity code of conduct</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:34:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2011/09/us-government-looks-to-fight-botnets-with-isp-code-of-conduct.ars?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+arstechnica/index+(Ars+Technica+-+Featured+Content)">Ars Technica</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/09/21/2011-24180/models-to-advance-voluntary-corporate-notification-to-consumers-regarding-the-illicit-use-of">Federal Register</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20050327/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/us-government-to-beat-back-botnets-with-a-cybersecurity-code-of-conduct/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists build WiFi hunter-killer drone and call it SkyNET&#8230; Viene Tormenta!</title>
		<link>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet-viene-tormenta</link>
		<comments>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet-viene-tormenta#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ahmet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aerial Drone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AerialDrone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone Copter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DroneCopter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HAL 9000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hal9000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wireless Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HomeWirelessSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parrot ar.drone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ParrotArDrone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proteus IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProteusIv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quadcopter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robopocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skynet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stevens Institute Of Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StevensInstituteOfTechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WirelessHack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WirelessSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/10/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	

	You'd think scientists would proscribe certain names for their inventions -- you wouldn't be taken seriously if your supercomputer was called HAL 9000, WOPR or Proteus IV would you? Well, a team from the Stevens Institute of Technology isn't liste...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/10/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/skynetbotnetdrone.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	You&#8217;d think scientists would proscribe certain names for their inventions &#8212; you wouldn&#8217;t be taken seriously if your supercomputer was called <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/movie-gadget-friday-2010-the-year-we-make-contact/">HAL 9000</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/10/23/movie-gadget-friday-the-w-o-p-r-from-wargames/">WOPR</a> or Proteus IV would you? Well, a team from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/3d-mapping-drone-fires-off-lasers-from-a-mile-away-video/">Stevens Institute of Technology</a> isn&#8217;t listening, because it&#8217;s developing an aerial drone and calling it SkyNET. A Linux box, strapped to a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/15/parrot-ar-drone-hits-the-us-this-september-for-299/">Parrot A.R. Drone</a>, can fly within range of your home wireless network and electronically attack it from the air. Whilst internet-only attacks are traceable to some extent, drone attacks are difficult to detect until it&#8217;s too late &#8212; you&#8217;d have to catch it in the act and chase it off with a long-handled pitchfork, or something. The team is working on refining the technology to make it cheaper than the $600 it currently costs and advise that people toughen up their domestic wireless security. We advise they stop pushing us ever closer towards the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/08/robopocalypse-coming-soon-to-a-theater-near-you-spielberg-to-sm/">Robopocalypse. </a></div>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/10/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet/">Scientists build WiFi hunter-killer drone and call it SkyNET&#8230; Viene Tormenta!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 10 Sep 2011 05:58:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/10/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20103599-1/diy-flying-robo-hacker-threatens-wireless-networks/?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">Crave</a></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.usenix.org/events/woot11/tech/final_files/Reed.pdf">SkyNET Paper (PDF)</a></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20038593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/10/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/scientists-build-wifi-hunter-killer-drone-and-call-it-skynet-viene-tormenta/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visualized: preconceived notions about personal computer security</title>
		<link>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-security</link>
		<comments>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-security#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ahmet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MichiganState]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ModelS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-securit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
See that chart up there? That's a beautiful visualization of a dozen folk models surrounding the idea of home computer security, devised by Michigan State's own Rick Wash. To construct it (as well pen the textual explanations to back it), he interview...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-securit/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/computer-security-infographic.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
<p>See that chart up there? That&#8217;s a beautiful <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/Visualized">visualization</a> of a dozen folk models surrounding the idea of home computer security, devised by Michigan State&#8217;s own Rick Wash. To construct it (as well pen the textual explanations to back it), he interviewed a number of computer users with varying levels of sophistication, with the goal being to find out how normal Earthlings interpreted potential threats to their PC. His findings? A vast amount of home PCs are frequently insecure because &#8220;they are administered by untrained, unskilled users.&#8221; He also found that PCs remain largely at risk <i>despite</i> a blossoming network of preventative software and advice, and almost certainly received an A for his efforts. Hit the source link for more, but only after you&#8217;ve spiffed up, thrown on a pair of spectacles and kicked one foot up on the coffee table that sits in front of you.
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-securit/">Visualized: preconceived notions about personal computer security</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:23:00 EDT.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-securit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2011/03/22/folk-models-of-home.html">Boing Boing</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.rickwash.com/papers/rwash-homesec-soups10-final.pdf">Rick Wash (PDF)</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19890779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-securit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/visualized-preconceived-notions-about-personal-computer-security/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory card, not Vodafone Magic itself, responsible for Android botnet strike</title>
		<link>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/memory-card-not-vodafone-magic-itself-responsible-for-android-botnet-strike</link>
		<comments>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/memory-card-not-vodafone-magic-itself-responsible-for-android-botnet-strike#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ahmet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdcard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="rtecenter"><a href="/sites/androidcentral.com/files/articleimage/Phil%20Nickinson/2010/03/magic-large.jpg"><img width="225" height="321" class="lightbox2" alt="Vodafone Magic" src="http://www.androidcentral.com/sites/androidcentral.com/files/articleimage/Phil%20Nickinson/2010/03/thumb_tall_magic-large.jpg" /></a></p> <p class="rteleft">Stories have been going around that a botnet was being spread by the <a href="http://androidcentral.com/tags/magic">HTC&#160;Magic</a> on&#160;Vodafone. Specifically, <a href="http://research.pandasecurity.com/vodafone-distributes-mariposa/">it was Panda Security</a> that sounded the alarm after they plugged in said Android phone and had all kinds of alarms go off. However, it turns out it was an infected memory card that was the culprit, and not a bad batch of phones, as original post author Pedro Bustamante later points out in the comments.</p> <blockquote> <p class="rteleft">It&#8217;s the memory card for sure, not the actual Android filesystem. It could be a malicious employee, a bad batch, provided by the manufacturer, lack of QA or a returned and refurbished unit. But as you said, either way Vodafone needs to better QA these before shipping out to customers.</p> </blockquote> <p>Pedro's right, there should be better Q&#38;A to keep this from happening. But there also should be a little more discretion used before we see headlines such as &#34;Vodafone distributes Mariposa botnet.&#34; (And the post itself hasn't been updated?) An infected memory card is bad, but one bad apple does not an outbreak make. The sky's not falling, folks.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?a=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?a=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?i=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?a=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/androidcentral/~4/9Czoj5tgV84" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="rtecenter"><a href="http://www.androidcentral.com/sites/androidcentral.com/files/articleimage/Phil%20Nickinson/2010/03/magic-large.jpg"><img width="225" height="321" class="lightbox2" alt="Vodafone Magic" src="http://www.androidcentral.com/sites/androidcentral.com/files/articleimage/Phil%20Nickinson/2010/03/thumb_tall_magic-large.jpg" /></a></p>
<p class="rteleft">Stories have been going around that a botnet was being spread by the <a href="http://androidcentral.com/tags/magic">HTC&nbsp;Magic</a> on&nbsp;Vodafone. Specifically, <a href="http://research.pandasecurity.com/vodafone-distributes-mariposa/">it was Panda Security</a> that sounded the alarm after they plugged in said Android phone and had all kinds of alarms go off. However, it turns out it was an infected memory card that was the culprit, and not a bad batch of phones, as original post author Pedro Bustamante later points out in the comments.</p>
<blockquote><p class="rteleft">It&rsquo;s the memory card for sure, not the actual Android filesystem. It could be a malicious employee, a bad batch, provided by the manufacturer, lack of QA or a returned and refurbished unit. But as you said, either way Vodafone needs to better QA these before shipping out to customers.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Pedro&#8217;s right, there should be better Q&amp;A to keep this from happening. But there also should be a little more discretion used before we see headlines such as &quot;Vodafone distributes Mariposa botnet.&quot; (And the post itself hasn&#8217;t been updated?) An infected memory card is bad, but one bad apple does not an outbreak make. The sky&#8217;s not falling, folks.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?a=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?a=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?i=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?a=9Czoj5tgV84:fOBjSIWgwPQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/androidcentral?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/androidcentral/~4/9Czoj5tgV84" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droidstone.com/news-feed/memory-card-not-vodafone-magic-itself-responsible-for-android-botnet-strike/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

